Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lillia Gajewski's avatar

The worst thing to happen to science fiction was the green screen.

I started Aliens Romulus the other day and I stopped watching, not because it was bad but because I found I had to pay more attention than I was giving it. However, I could tell even half an hour in, what I was promised as a "returning to the roots of Ellen Ripley" was far from that.

The original Aliens movie managed to develop the characters in a few lines (depending on some well worn character types, yes, but still) and tell a story all in a world where everything you see on the screen had to be created by hand in some way. The story had to be good to carry the picture because there were limitations on the scenery and the monsters. Whatever you thought of the later Alien movies (up to Alien Resurrection), they were also forced to rely on story telling. Same thing with movies like Event Horizon or Super Nova. There had to be a story because the effects weren't going to carry the movie.

I honestly think people have forgotten how to write a good movie, with some few exceptions. They have no idea why the old movies worked.

Just FYI, in case you didn't know, Annihilation was based on the first of a series of books collectively called the Southern Reach series, by James VanderMeer. The movie is actually a good adaptation given the limits of turning movies into books, but the books are far more psychologically driven. I've not seen the source you cite, so I won't say that VanderMeer didn't "adapt" it for his use, but the movie itself is a full-on adaptation of a written work.

Expand full comment
SRwilson's avatar

Thanks, that saved me 95 minutes of time better spent doing whatever.

Expand full comment

No posts